Daniel E. Syroid

1.1k citations
11 papers · 970 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Syroid

11 papers receiving 943 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Syroid
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Developmental Neuroscience 227
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 694
  • Neurology 139
  • Neurology 59
  • Molecular Biology 440
Replace David Pleasure with:
David Pleasure United States
P. Ann Eccleston United States
Usha Rani Reddy United States
Masakiyo Sasahara Japan
Kate Reid Australia
Cassandra Lee Kirk United States
C F Eldridge United States
A. Dautigny France
Robert G. Farrer United States
Shanzheng Yang Sweden
Daniel E. Syroid relative to David Pleasure United States David Pleasure's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
David Pleasure · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Syroid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Syroid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Syroid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Syroid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Syroid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Syroid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Syroid. The network helps show where Daniel E. Syroid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Syroid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Syroid Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Syroid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1996210
2 1996177
3 1999119
4 2000116
5 1999112
6 200098
7 199993
8 199219
9 199314
10 19946
11 19946

About Daniel E. Syroid

Daniel E. Syroid is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 970 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (227 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (694 citations), Neurology (139 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Molecular Biology (440 citations). Daniel E. Syroid has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Greg Lemke, Trevor John Kilpatrick, Todd S. Zorick, Patrick Burrola, Merja Soilu‐Hänninen, Edgardo J. Arroyo, Steven S. Scherer, Tamara Bucci, Peter R. Maycox and David J. Wen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Nucleic Acids Research, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact