Daniel E. Read

113 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Daniel E. Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • General Decision Sciences 2.4k
  • Applied Psychology 915
  • Safety Research 699
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.7k
  • Marketing 556
Replace Richard Paul Larrick with:
Richard Paul Larrick United States
Ilana Ritov Israel
Christopher K. Hsee United States
Thomas Dohmen Germany
Ted O’Donoghue United States
Denis Hilton France
Uwe Sunde Germany
David Huffman United States
Mary Frances Luce United States
Sandra L. Schneider United States
Daniel E. Read relative to Richard Paul Larrick United States Richard Paul Larrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Paul Larrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Read. The network helps show where Daniel E. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Read Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994513
2 1998420
3 1999323
4 1995316
5 2010306
6 2001279
7
Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives of Intertemporal Choice
2003244
8 2004233
9 1994232
10 1999194
11 2010182
12 2005181
13 2005164
14 2005127
15 2003105
16 2006104
17 200392
18 199576
19 201271
20 200769

About Daniel E. Read

Daniel E. Read is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (53 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (40 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (24 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (2.4k citations), Applied Psychology (915 citations), Safety Research (699 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.7k citations) and Marketing (556 citations). Daniel E. Read has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include George F. Loewenstein, Millett Granger Morgan, Ann Bostrom, Marc Scholten, Baruch Fischhoff, Nicoleta Read, Matthew Rabin, Shane William Frederick, Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma and Roy Frederick Baumeister. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Risk Analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Management Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact