Daniel E. Kaiser

49 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Soil Science 303
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 280
  • Environmental Chemistry 152
  • Plant Science 344
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 41
Replace Jinfeng Yang with:
Jinfeng Yang China
Nuno Moreira Portugal
Ming Huang China
Adriano Perín Brazil
W.C.T. Chamen United Kingdom
J. Evans Australia
Fernándo Estellés Spain
Lianfeng Wang China
Volkhard Scholz Germany
J.W. Dickson Hungary
Daniel E. Kaiser relative to Jinfeng Yang China Jinfeng Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jinfeng Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Kaiser. The network helps show where Daniel E. Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201963
2 200953
3 201244
4 201337
5 201936
6
Fertilizer Guidelines for Agronomic Crops in Minnesota
201135
7 201934
8 201033
9 201730
10 201629
11 201927
12 201326
13 201526
14 201925
15 202025
16 201124
17 201723
18 201022
19 201921
20 201419

About Daniel E. Kaiser

Daniel E. Kaiser is a scholar working on Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Environmental Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (22 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (17 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (13 papers), Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (8 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (6 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (6 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (6 papers) and Soil Management and Crop Yield (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (303 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (280 citations), Environmental Chemistry (152 citations), Plant Science (344 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (41 citations). Daniel E. Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include John A. Lamb, Volker Schulze, Stefan Dietrich, Antonio P. Mallarino, Ki‐In Kim, Jeffrey A. Coulter, Fabián G. Fernández, Craig C. Sheaffer, James Damon and Jochum Wiersma. Their work appears in journals such as Agronomy Journal, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Thermochimica Acta, Journal of Environmental Quality and Cereal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact