Daniel E. Canfield

85 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Daniel E. Canfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Environmental Chemistry 1.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 826
  • Oceanography 763
  • Water Science and Technology 761
  • Ecology 1.1k
Replace Mark V. Hoyer with:
Mark V. Hoyer United States
Roger W. Bachmann United States
Max L. Bothwell Canada
Sandra Poikāne Italy
George G. Ganf Australia
Lone Liboriussen Denmark
Rikke Bjerring Denmark
Gábor Várbíró Hungary
Geoff Phillips United Kingdom
Gábor Borics Hungary
Daniel E. Canfield relative to Mark V. Hoyer United States Mark V. Hoyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark V. Hoyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Canfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Canfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Canfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Canfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Canfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Canfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Canfield. The network helps show where Daniel E. Canfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Canfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Canfield Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Canfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981266
2 1983154
3 2002110
4 1996106
5 2002102
6 199994
7 200093
8 200092
9 199489
10 199474
11 198868
12 198364
13 200963
14 198955
15
Evaluation of macrophyte control in 38 Florida lakes using triploid grass carp
200052
16 202045
17 198844
18 201244
19 198735
20 201534

About Daniel E. Canfield

Daniel E. Canfield is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Ecology and Oceanography, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (61 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (43 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (31 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (28 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (22 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (8 papers) and Water Quality and Resources Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (1.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (826 citations), Oceanography (763 citations), Water Science and Technology (761 citations) and Ecology (1.1k citations). Daniel E. Canfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark V. Hoyer, Roger W. Bachmann, Carlos M. Duarte, Jerome V. Shireman, Edward J. Phli̇ps, John R. Jones, Susana Agustı́, Douglas E. Colle, Michael J. Maceina and Micheal S. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrobiologia, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Limnology and Oceanography, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association and North American Journal of Fisheries Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact