Daniel E. Bailey

19 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • General Psychology 21
  • Family Practice 9
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Philip Levy with:
Philip Levy United Kingdom
Johan O. Undheim Norway
Harald Schaub Germany
Melissa Kline Struhl United States
Janet J. Turnage United States
Wayne S. Zimmerman United States
James G. Snider United States
Gerald S. Hanna United States
Jennifer Williams Australia
Rebecca M. Pliske United States
Daniel E. Bailey relative to Philip Levy United Kingdom Philip Levy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Philip Levy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Bailey. The network helps show where Daniel E. Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Bailey Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Clinical inference and cognitive theory
1960119
2 196683
3 199775
4 195647
5 197229
6 197217
7 199311
8
Digital computing : Fortran IV and its applications in behavioral science
196811
9 19758
10
Computer Science in Social and Behavioral Science Education
19786
11 19985
12 20023
13 19653
14 19723
15 19803
16 19792
17 19791
18 19731
19 19691
20 19660

About Daniel E. Bailey

Daniel E. Bailey is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Q Methodology Applications (1 paper), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper), Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes (1 paper), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (21 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations), General Decision Sciences (8 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Daniel E. Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Tryon, Theodore R. Sarbin, Ronald Taft, Mark R. Brinker, Robert C. Bolles, S. D. Silvey, F. Downton, Peter G. Polson, Gérald Goldstein and Desmond S. Cartwright. Their work appears in journals such as Behavior Research Methods, Metal Finishing, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Academy of Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact