Daniel E. Acuña

37 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Acuña
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 223
  • General Decision Sciences 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 212
  • Information Systems and Management 62
  • Social Psychology 112
Replace David G. Dobolyi with:
David G. Dobolyi United States
Xiaofei Lu United States
John Kingston United States
Murat Perit Çakır Türkiye
Dorrit Billman United States
Stanley R. Trollip United States
Yvonne Wærn Sweden
Vânia Paula de Almeida Néris Brazil
Marsha C. Lovett United States
Cengiz Acartürk Türkiye
Daniel E. Acuña relative to David G. Dobolyi United States David G. Dobolyi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17.2×
David G. Dobolyi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Acuña

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Acuña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Acuña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Acuña more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Acuña

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Acuña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Acuña. The network helps show where Daniel E. Acuña may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Acuña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Acuña Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Acuña links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012163
2 201681
3 201675
4 201875
5 201874
6 201248
7 201046
8 201544
9 201439
10 202320
11 202019
12
Bayesian modeling of human sequential decision-making on the multi-armed bandit problem
200819
13 202219
14 202014
15 201812
16 202012
17 201011
18 20229
19 20169
20 20218

About Daniel E. Acuña

Daniel E. Acuña is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Topic Modeling (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (223 citations), General Decision Sciences (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (212 citations), Information Systems and Management (62 citations) and Social Psychology (112 citations). Daniel E. Acuña has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Konrad P. Körding, Stefano Allesina, Titipat Achakulvisut, Max Berniker, Stephen V. David, Scott T. Grafton, Jean Liénard, Hugo L. Fernandes, Robert S. Turner and James A. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PLoS Computational Biology, Journal of Informetrics, Nature Communications and Science Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact