Daniel Deutscher

51 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Deutscher
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Rehabilitation 185
  • Pharmacology 414
  • Occupational Therapy 72
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 181
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 158
Replace Jerome E. Mioduski with:
Jerome E. Mioduski United States
William G. Boissonnault United States
Esther Williamson United Kingdom
Thomas Maribo Denmark
Lena Nilsson‐Wikmar Sweden
Janet K. Freburger United States
Paul Enthoven Sweden
Henrik Hein Lauridsen Denmark
Leonardo Pellicciari Italy
Annette Swinkels United Kingdom
Daniel Deutscher relative to Jerome E. Mioduski United States Jerome E. Mioduski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jerome E. Mioduski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Deutscher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Deutscher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Deutscher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Deutscher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Deutscher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Deutscher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Deutscher. The network helps show where Daniel Deutscher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Deutscher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Deutscher Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Deutscher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201297
2 202190
3 200781
4 200975
5 200775
6 200852
7 201540
8 202134
9 201533
10 201332
11
Implementing computerized adaptive tests in routine clinical practice: experience implementing CATs.
201028
12 202124
13 201224
14 201123
15 201823
16 201222
17 201121
18 201321
19 201020
20 200920

About Daniel Deutscher

Daniel Deutscher is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health, Rehabilitation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (23 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (185 citations), Pharmacology (414 citations), Occupational Therapy (72 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (181 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (158 citations). Daniel Deutscher has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dennis L. Hart, Susan D. Horn, Mark W. Werneke, Gerben DeJong, Ruth Dickstein, Jerome E. Mioduski, Paul W. Stratford, Randall J. Smout, David Grigsby and D.H. de Bakker. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Quality of Life Research and Psychology and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact