Daniel Deimel

23 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Daniel Deimel
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Toxicology 32
  • Infectious Diseases 121
  • Clinical Psychology 122
  • Epidemiology 119
  • Social Psychology 66
Replace Matthew Hibbert with:
Matthew Hibbert United Kingdom
David Stuart United Kingdom
Steven Maxwell United Kingdom
Janey Sewell United Kingdom
Melissa Rader United States
Xiaobin Cao China
Madeline Rader United States
Warren Michelow Canada
Adi Jaffe United States
Rachel Glass United Kingdom
Daniel Deimel relative to Matthew Hibbert United Kingdom Matthew Hibbert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Matthew Hibbert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Deimel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Deimel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Deimel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Deimel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Deimel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Deimel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Deimel. The network helps show where Daniel Deimel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Deimel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Deimel Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Deimel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202094
2 201682
3 201856
4 201943
5 202122
6 201911
7 202210
8 201610
9 20227
10 20137
11 20216
12 20234
13 20243
14 20243
15 20183
16 20212
17 20202
18 20231
19 20241
20 20241

About Daniel Deimel

Daniel Deimel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Health and Medical Studies (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers) and Media Influence and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (32 citations), Infectious Diseases (121 citations), Clinical Psychology (122 citations), Epidemiology (119 citations) and Social Psychology (66 citations). Daniel Deimel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Sander, Heino Stöver, Norbert Scherbaum, Thorsten Köhler, Henrike Schecke, Annette Bohn, Toby Lea, Christine Firk, Hermann Josef Abs and Thomas Köhler. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Harm Reduction Journal, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact