Daniel Cussac

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Cussac
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Genetics 339
  • Biomaterials 241
  • Surgery 374
  • Molecular Biology 455
  • Developmental Neuroscience 24
Replace Marie‐Ange Renault with:
Marie‐Ange Renault France
Ken Suzuki United Kingdom
Yanying Liu China
June Seok Heo South Korea
Debora Lo Furno Italy
Chandra Viswanathan India
Antonella Zacheo Italy
Melike Mut Türkiye
Kyung‐Sub Moon South Korea
Stefania Elena Navone Italy
Daniel Cussac relative to Marie‐Ange Renault France Marie‐Ange Renault's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Marie‐Ange Renault · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cussac

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cussac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cussac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cussac more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cussac

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cussac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cussac. The network helps show where Daniel Cussac may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cussac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cussac Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cussac links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009226
2 2008168
3 199783
4 200380
5 201277
6 201160
7 201351
8 201245
9 201044
10 200044
11 200243
12 201738
13 201938
14 201436
15 201931
16 199629
17 200227
18 200626
19 202226
20 202125

About Daniel Cussac

Daniel Cussac is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Biomaterials, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (11 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (9 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (3 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (339 citations), Biomaterials (241 citations), Surgery (374 citations), Molecular Biology (455 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (24 citations). Daniel Cussac has collaborated with scholars based in France, Greece and Mali. Frequent co-authors include Angelo Parini, Denis Calise, Céline Mias, Philippe Bourin, Marie‐Hélène Séguélas, Marie‐Dominique Piercecchi‐Marti, Caroline Ceccaldi, Olivier Lairez, Colette Denis and Jérôme Roncalli. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Transplantation, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Stem Cells and Acta Biomaterialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact