Daniel Crow
Impact in
-
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Papers in
-
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research 3
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates 3
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena 3
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Co-authors
- Robert Joynt (3 shared papers)Mark E. Saffman (1 shared paper)Mark G. Friesen (1 shared paper)Joydip Ghosh (1 shared paper)Susan Coppersmith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PRX Quantum (2 papers)Physical Review A (2 papers)Physical Review X (2 papers)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)Ratio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Crow
11 papers receiving 229 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 155
- Artificial Intelligence 138
- Philosophy 18
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Crow
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Crow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Crow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Crow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Crow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Crow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Crow. The network helps show where Daniel Crow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Crow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 2 |
About Daniel Crow
Daniel Crow is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (3 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (155 citations), Artificial Intelligence (138 citations), Philosophy (18 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1 citation) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (12 citations). Daniel Crow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Joynt, Mark E. Saffman, Mark G. Friesen, Joydip Ghosh and Susan Coppersmith. Their work appears in journals such as PRX Quantum, Physical Review A, Physical Review X, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Ratio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.