Daniel Cohnitz

628 citations
45 papers · 170 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cohnitz

36 papers receiving 142 citations

Peers

Daniel Cohnitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Philosophy 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 29
  • Artificial Intelligence 39
Replace Murali Ramachandran with:
Murali Ramachandran United Kingdom
Lawrence Brian Lombard United States
Sebastiano Moruzzi Italy
Arif Ahmed United Kingdom
Nicholas Denyer United Kingdom
Salvatore Florio United States
Simon Goldstein Hong Kong
Kelly Becker United States
Lionel Shapiro United States
Nate Charlow Canada
Daniel Cohnitz relative to Murali Ramachandran United Kingdom Murali Ramachandran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Murali Ramachandran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cohnitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cohnitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cohnitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cohnitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cohnitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cohnitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cohnitz. The network helps show where Daniel Cohnitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cohnitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cohnitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cohnitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200421
2 200520
3 201217
4 201415
5 20038
6 20197
7 20066
8 20136
9 20125
10 20214
11 20204
12 20094
13 20174
14 20054
15 20063
16
On the Rationality of Conspiracy Theories
20183
17 20143
18 20043
19
Explanations are like salted peanuts
20023
20
The role of intuitions in philosophical methodology
20092

About Daniel Cohnitz

Daniel Cohnitz is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 45 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), Philosophy (84 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (29 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (39 citations). Daniel Cohnitz has collaborated with scholars based in Estonia, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jussi Haukioja, Teresa Marques, Michael Baurmann, Barry Smith, Ali Teymoori, Margit Sutrop and Peter Pagin. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, dialectica, Croatian Journal of Philosophy and Ratio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact