Daniel Chapman

2.6k citations
30 papers · 920 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Chapman

26 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers

Daniel Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Applied Psychology 176
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 233
  • Communication 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 458
  • Social Psychology 197
Replace Rainer Romero‐Canyas with:
Rainer Romero‐Canyas United States
Susan Alisat Canada
Natasha M. Loi Australia
Robyn K. Mallett United States
Adam R. Pearson United States
Nathaniel Geiger United States
Christopher Wolsko United States
Erin P. Hennes United States
Laura S. Loy Germany
Samantha K. Stanley Australia
Daniel Chapman relative to Rainer Romero‐Canyas United States Rainer Romero‐Canyas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rainer Romero‐Canyas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Chapman. The network helps show where Daniel Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011262
2 2017180
3 201897
4 201693
5 202068
6 201037
7 201727
8 201925
9 201523
10 201717
11 201912
12 202410
13 202110
14 201710
15 201810
16 20219
17 20206
18 20195
19 20254
20 20243

About Daniel Chapman

Daniel Chapman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, Applied Psychology and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 920 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Communication and Perception (10 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (7 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (176 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (233 citations), Communication (76 citations), Sociology and Political Science (458 citations) and Social Psychology (197 citations). Daniel Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ezra M. Markowitz, Brian Lickel, Adam Corner, Christopher Peterson, Rosemarie Kobau, Matthew M. Zack, Ed Diener, W. Thompson, Martin E. P. Seligman and Susie Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychological and Personality Science, Climatic Change, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Nature Climate Change and Environmental Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact