Daniel C. Stokes
Impact in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 2
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 5
- Co-authors
- Raina M. Merchant (4 shared papers)Anish K. Agarwal (2 shared papers)Sharath Chandra Guntuku (3 shared papers)Lyle Ungar (2 shared papers)Emily Seltzer (1 shared paper)Garrick Sherman (1 shared paper)Zachary F. Meisel (5 shared papers)Jonathan Purtle (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (2 papers)Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (1 paper)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)Psychiatric Services (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Daniel C. Stokes
14 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Applied Psychology 23
- Health 33
- Family Practice 7
- Social Psychology 63
- Clinical Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Stokes. The network helps show where Daniel C. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 5 | Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward. | 2021 | 13 |
| 6 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | Understanding Social Support Expressed in a COVID-19 Online Forum | 2021 | 6 |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Daniel C. Stokes
Daniel C. Stokes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Health and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 15 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (23 citations), Health (33 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Social Psychology (63 citations) and Clinical Psychology (61 citations). Daniel C. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Raina M. Merchant, Anish K. Agarwal, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Lyle Ungar, Emily Seltzer, Garrick Sherman, Zachary F. Meisel, Jonathan Purtle, Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako and Alison M. Buttenheim. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, JAMA Network Open and Psychiatric Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.