Daniel C. Shaver
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Treatment of Major Depression
Papers in
-
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology 3
-
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 2
- Co-authors
- Logan Grosenick (1 shared paper)Mitchell H. Murdock (1 shared paper)Haruhiko Bito (1 shared paper)Thu N. Huynh (1 shared paper)David L. Rosenthal (1 shared paper)Lara Nellissen (1 shared paper)Robert N. Fetcho (1 shared paper)Teresa A. Milner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 paper)Cell (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel C. Shaver
8 papers receiving 740 citations
Daniel C. Shaver's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Behavioral Neuroscience 57
- Pharmacology 295
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 148
- Developmental Neuroscience 33
- Biological Psychiatry 12
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Shaver
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Shaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Shaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Shaver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Shaver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Shaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Shaver. The network helps show where Daniel C. Shaver may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Shaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sustained rescue of prefrontal circuit dysfunction by antidepressant-induced spine formation Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 533 |
| 2 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2026 | 1 |
About Daniel C. Shaver
Daniel C. Shaver is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Biophysics, Pharmacology, Developmental Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations), Pharmacology (295 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (148 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (33 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (12 citations). Daniel C. Shaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Logan Grosenick, Mitchell H. Murdock, Haruhiko Bito, Thu N. Huynh, David L. Rosenthal, Lara Nellissen, Robert N. Fetcho, Teresa A. Milner, Haruo Kasai and Conor M. Liston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visualized Experiments, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Cell, Science and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.