Daniel C. Kemp

629 citations
11 papers · 488 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
    • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Papers in

Daniel C. Kemp

11 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmacology 133
  • Transplantation 40
  • Physiology 27
  • Cell Biology 77
  • Oncology 124
Replace T J Scallen with:
T J Scallen United States
Yvonne Gloor Switzerland
Claire Denizot France
Heinrich Iber Germany
Fabienne Z. Gaugaz Sweden
David F. Gebhard United States
Paresh P. Chothe United States
Tomoya Yasujima Japan
Alessia Francesca Mozzi Italy
Daniel C. Kemp relative to T J Scallen United States T J Scallen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
T J Scallen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Kemp. The network helps show where Daniel C. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2002152
2 2014132
3 200455
4 200142
5 200432
6 201128
7 201716
8 201513
9 201310
10 19755
11 20213

About Daniel C. Kemp

Daniel C. Kemp is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pharmacology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper), Animal testing and alternatives (1 paper) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (133 citations), Transplantation (40 citations), Physiology (27 citations), Cell Biology (77 citations) and Oncology (124 citations). Daniel C. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Fan, Jeffrey Stevens, Kim L. R. Brouwer, Alastair Morrison, Naveen Bojjireddy, Steve Wilson, Richard A. Peterson, Gerald Hammond, Chris B. Moore and Tamás Balla. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Toxicological Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Mathematische Annalen and Bioanalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact