Daniel C. Billing

1.3k citations
44 papers · 988 · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Billing

42 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Billing
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Occupational Therapy 473
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 289
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 62
  • Rehabilitation 55
  • Pharmacology 126
Replace Tyson Grier with:
Tyson Grier United States
Michael E. LaFiandra United States
David M. Frost Canada
Ben Schram Australia
Michelle Canham-Chervak United States
Dieter Leyk Germany
Ulrika Aasa Sweden
Ubon Pirunsan Thailand
Yong Tai Wang United States
Thomas Karakolis Canada
Daniel C. Billing relative to Tyson Grier United States Tyson Grier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Tyson Grier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Billing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Billing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Billing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Billing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Billing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Billing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Billing. The network helps show where Daniel C. Billing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Billing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Billing Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Billing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018130
2 201166
3 202059
4 201053
5 201646
6 201545
7 201544
8 201841
9 201335
10 202031
11 201828
12 201827
13 201325
14 201525
15 201525
16 201524
17 201523
18 201823
19 202122
20 201522

About Daniel C. Billing

Daniel C. Billing is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmacology and Social Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (30 papers), Sports Performance and Training (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (8 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (7 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers) and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (473 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (289 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (62 citations), Rehabilitation (55 citations) and Pharmacology (126 citations). Daniel C. Billing has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Hunt, Jace R. Drain, Brad Aisbett, Kurt L. Mudie, Herbert Groeller, Daniel James, Karl E. Friedl, Andrew Wixted, Joanne N. Caldwell and Paul J. Tofari. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of science and medicine in sport, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Applied Ergonomics, Ergonomics and International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact