Daniel Buck

730 citations
9 papers · 495 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Buck

9 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Daniel Buck
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 180
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 26
  • Plant Science 407
  • Strategy and Management 125
  • Business and International Management 14
Replace Everard Smith with:
Everard Smith United Kingdom
Kathryn De Master United States
Jim Bingen United States
Phil Mount Canada
Stacy Miller United States
Neva Hassanein United States
Laura Venn United Kingdom
Ronan Le Velly France
Branden Born United States
María Fonte Italy
Daniel Buck relative to Everard Smith United Kingdom Everard Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Everard Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Buck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Buck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Buck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Buck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Buck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Buck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Buck. The network helps show where Daniel Buck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Buck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Buck Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Buck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1997374
2 201186
3 200712
4 20007
5
The Ecological Question: Can Capitalism Prevail?
20076
6 20093
7
Constructing China's Capitalism: Shanghai and the Nexus of Urban-Rural Industries
20123
8 20232
9 20122

About Daniel Buck

Daniel Buck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (2 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (1 paper), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper) and Wine Industry and Tourism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (180 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (26 citations), Plant Science (407 citations), Strategy and Management (125 citations) and Business and International Management (14 citations). Daniel Buck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Julie Guthman and Jennifer Hayden. Their work appears in journals such as Human Geography, Sociologia Ruralis, Antipode, The Journal of Peasant Studies and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact