Daniel Brenner

540 citations
28 papers · 347 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Brenner

25 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Daniel Brenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Software 121
  • Linguistics and Language 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Sensory Systems 22
  • Information Systems 112
Replace Nik Swoboda with:
Nik Swoboda Spain
Yao Yao Hong Kong
Clara Meister Switzerland
Helmar Gust Germany
Jesse Spencer-Smith United States
Catherine G. Wolf United States
Fabrizio Fioravanti Italy
Rüdi Lutz United Kingdom
Maarten Versteegh Netherlands
Lloyd H. Nakatani United States
Daniel Brenner relative to Nik Swoboda Spain Nik Swoboda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Nik Swoboda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Brenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Brenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Brenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Brenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Brenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Brenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Brenner. The network helps show where Daniel Brenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Brenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Brenner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Brenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201863
2 200738
3 198238
4 200636
5 201526
6 200826
7 200723
8 200622
9 200820
10 200612
11 202111
12 20134
13 20104
14
Improving Testing Efficiency through Component Harvesting
20064
15 20104
16 20173
17 20102
18 20222
19
The Phonetics of Mandarin Tones in Conversation
20152
20 20141

About Daniel Brenner

Daniel Brenner is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Software, Linguistics and Language and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 28 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (13 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (10 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (10 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (4 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (121 citations), Linguistics and Language (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), Sensory Systems (22 citations) and Information Systems (112 citations). Daniel Brenner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Colin Atkinson, Robert E. Johnston, Rainer Malaka, Barbara Paech, Benjamin V. Tucker, Michelle Sims, Oliver Hummel, Andrew Carnie, Natasha Warner and Michael Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, Computer, Behavior Research Methods and Language Resources and Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact