Daniel Bourbonnais

138 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Bourbonnais
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Rehabilitation 1.7k
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 576
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 926
  • Neurology 396
  • Rheumatology 592
Replace Willy De Weerdt with:
Willy De Weerdt Belgium
Hilde Feys Belgium
Steven Truijen Belgium
Gűneş Yavuzer Türkiye
Roberta B. Shepherd Australia
Stuart A. Binder‐Macleod United States
Timothy J. Doherty Canada
Sandra J. Olney Canada
Nam‐Jong Paik South Korea
Robert L. Waters United States
Daniel Bourbonnais relative to Willy De Weerdt Belgium Willy De Weerdt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Willy De Weerdt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bourbonnais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bourbonnais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bourbonnais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bourbonnais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bourbonnais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bourbonnais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bourbonnais. The network helps show where Daniel Bourbonnais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bourbonnais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bourbonnais Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bourbonnais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999335
2 1999237
3 1999235
4 1989202
5 1996172
6 2006159
7 2015151
8 2004121
9 1981111
10 2004105
11 1984101
12 200488
13 200387
14 200485
15 198981
16 199078
17 200277
18 200376
19 201776
20 200275

About Daniel Bourbonnais

Daniel Bourbonnais is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (36 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (33 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (20 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (18 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (14 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (12 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.7k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (576 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (926 citations), Neurology (396 citations) and Rheumatology (592 citations). Daniel Bourbonnais has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Denis Gravel, André Arsenault, Sylvie Nadeau, Johanne Desrosiers, Gina Bravo, Chantale Dumoulin, S. Vanden Noven, Marie‐Claude Lemieux, Mélanie Morin and René Pelletier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hand Therapy, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Rehabilitation, Neurourology and Urodynamics and Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact