Daniel B. Pike

879 citations
14 papers · 720 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel B. Pike

14 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Daniel B. Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Biomaterials 300
  • Emergency Medical Services 133
  • Molecular Medicine 46
  • Immunology and Allergy 36
  • Cell Biology 85
Replace Yongquan Gu with:
Yongquan Gu China
A. Hari Reddi United States
Shuhei Tsuchiya Japan
Ako Ishihara United States
Su Yeon Jeon South Korea
Kaitlin C. Murphy United States
Jun Ohno Japan
Chau‐Zen Wang Taiwan
Han Na Yang South Korea
Qilin Liu China
Daniel B. Pike relative to Yongquan Gu China Yongquan Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Yongquan Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Pike. The network helps show where Daniel B. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel B. Pike Line = papers co-authored together Daniel B. Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2006264
2 200981
3 201453
4 201949
5 201148
6 200846
7 201137
8 201026
9 201923
10 201721
11 201820
12 201619
13 201418
14 201415

About Daniel B. Pike

Daniel B. Pike is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (5 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (300 citations), Emergency Medical Services (133 citations), Molecular Medicine (46 citations), Immunology and Allergy (36 citations) and Cell Biology (85 citations). Daniel B. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hamidreza Ghandehari, Shenshen Cai, Matthew A. Firpo, Xiao Zheng Shu, Glenn D. Prestwich, Robert A. Peattie, Robert J. Fisher, Kyle Pomraning, Yan-Ting Shiu and Timmy Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology Progress, Molecular Pharmaceutics, Drug Delivery, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact