Daniel B. Pike
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Papers in
-
- Vascular Procedures and Complications 4
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 3
-
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis 6
- Co-authors
- Hamidreza Ghandehari (4 shared papers)Matthew A. Firpo (2 shared papers)Robert A. Peattie (2 shared papers)Shenshen Cai (2 shared papers)Robert J. Fisher (2 shared papers)Xiao Zheng Shu (2 shared papers)Glenn D. Prestwich (2 shared papers)Kyle Pomraning (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biotechnology Progress (2 papers)Drug Delivery (1 paper)Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (1 paper)Pharmaceutical Research (1 paper)Biomaterials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel B. Pike
14 papers receiving 755 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Biomaterials 326
- Emergency Medical Services 133
- Molecular Medicine 50
- Immunology and Allergy 37
- Cell Biology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Pike. The network helps show where Daniel B. Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 282 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 18 |
About Daniel B. Pike
Daniel B. Pike is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (5 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (326 citations), Emergency Medical Services (133 citations), Molecular Medicine (50 citations), Immunology and Allergy (37 citations) and Cell Biology (92 citations). Daniel B. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hamidreza Ghandehari, Matthew A. Firpo, Robert A. Peattie, Shenshen Cai, Robert J. Fisher, Xiao Zheng Shu, Glenn D. Prestwich, Kyle Pomraning, Yan-Ting Shiu and Nate Larson. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology Progress, Drug Delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Pharmaceutical Research and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.