Phil E M Smith

9.6k citations
112 papers · 2.8k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Phil E M Smith

105 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Phil E M Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 528
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 51
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 125
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 287
Replace Jorge J. Asconapé with:
Jorge J. Asconapé United States
Sanjeev V. Kothare United States
Mary D. King Ireland
Khara M. Sauro Canada
Christof Kessler Germany
K Ekbom Sweden
Maria Esposito Italy
Luca Vignatelli Italy
Martin Marziniak Germany
Jannick Brennum Denmark
Phil E M Smith relative to Jorge J. Asconapé United States Jorge J. Asconapé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jorge J. Asconapé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil E M Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil E M Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil E M Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil E M Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil E M Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil E M Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil E M Smith. The network helps show where Phil E M Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil E M Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil E M Smith Line = papers co-authored together Phil E M Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987166
2 2009156
3 1988154
4 1987137
5 200399
6 200694
7 201292
8 198989
9 200188
10 199988
11 200679
12 201166
13 200264
14 198963
15 201259
16 199656
17 201253
18 200953
19 201551
20 201751

About Phil E M Smith

Phil E M Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (47 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (27 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Neurological and metabolic disorders (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (528 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (51 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (125 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (287 citations). Phil E M Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Calverley, R. H. T. Edwards, R. H. T. Edwards, John M. Wild, William Owen Pickrell, Markus Reuber, Rebecca Mayor, Rhys H. Thomas, Mark I. Rees and G.A. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Seizure, Epilepsia, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Epilepsy & Behavior and CNS Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact