Daniel Atha

569 citations
25 papers · 474 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 10
    • Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 6
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 11

Daniel Atha

24 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Daniel Atha
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 80
  • Biochemistry 43
  • Plant Science 223
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Pharmacology 45
Replace Elaine Solowey with:
Elaine Solowey Israel
Frans M. Weitz South Africa
Anneleen Kool Norway
Zohar Amar Israel
Emin Uğurlu Türkiye
Ahmet Serteser Türkiye
César O. Núñez Argentina
Eloy Solano Mexico
Atefeh Pirani Iran
Zahoor A. Kaloo India
Daniel Atha relative to Elaine Solowey Israel Elaine Solowey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Elaine Solowey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Atha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Atha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Atha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Atha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Atha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Atha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Atha. The network helps show where Daniel Atha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Atha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Atha Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Atha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000141
2 2002105
3
Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Belize: With Common Names and Uses
200091
4 201917
5 201813
6 201612
7 201410
8 201610
9 20208
10 20207
11 20196
12 20216
13 20186
14 20185
15 20195
16 20215
17 20195
18 20194
19 20214
20 20084

About Daniel Atha

Daniel Atha is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (11 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (10 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers) and Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (80 citations), Biochemistry (43 citations), Plant Science (223 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Pharmacology (45 citations). Daniel Atha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Georgia and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael Nee, Michael J. Balick, Ulyana Muñoz Acuña, Edward J. Kennelly, Jun Ma, Patricia A. Lohr, Adriane Fugh‐Berman, Fredi Kronenberg, Marian Reiff and Andreana L. Ososki. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Phytotaxa and Natural Product Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact