Daniel Adam
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Surgery 5
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 5
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 1
-
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Franziska Preissing (2 shared papers)Michael Bauer (1 shared paper)Tobias Vogelmann (1 shared paper)Herwig Gerlach (1 shared paper)Oleg Borisenko (5 shared papers)Peter Funch‐Jensen (2 shared papers)Jan Hedenbro (1 shared paper)Rongrong Zhang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Value in Health (2 papers)Obesity Surgery (1 paper)Frontiers in Medicine (1 paper)Critical Care (1 paper)Obesity Facts (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkHungary
In The Last Decade
Daniel Adam
8 papers receiving 625 citations
Daniel Adam's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 64
- Epidemiology 252
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 7
- Family Practice 6
- Nephrology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Adam
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Adam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Adam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Adam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Adam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Adam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Adam. The network helps show where Daniel Adam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Adam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019— results from a systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 507 |
| 2 | 2015 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 1 |
About Daniel Adam
Daniel Adam is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Economics and Econometrics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (64 citations), Epidemiology (252 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (7 citations), Family Practice (6 citations) and Nephrology (23 citations). Daniel Adam has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Franziska Preissing, Michael Bauer, Tobias Vogelmann, Herwig Gerlach, Oleg Borisenko, Peter Funch‐Jensen, Jan Hedenbro, Rongrong Zhang, Ahmed R. Ahmed and Nicola Di Lorenzo. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Obesity Surgery, Frontiers in Medicine, Critical Care and Obesity Facts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.