Dania Schumann

1.2k citations
16 papers · 671 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dania Schumann

16 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Dania Schumann
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Gastroenterology 193
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 73
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 19
  • Physiology 143
  • Applied Psychology 22
Replace Hamed Daghaghzadeh with:
Hamed Daghaghzadeh Iran
Paula Skidmore New Zealand
Katri Peuhkuri Finland
John M. Berardi United States
Boris Le Nevé France
Wayren Loke Singapore
D A Roe United States
Sarah Wakefield United States
Saniye Bilici Türkiye
Dania Schumann relative to Hamed Daghaghzadeh Iran Hamed Daghaghzadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Hamed Daghaghzadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dania Schumann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dania Schumann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dania Schumann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dania Schumann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dania Schumann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dania Schumann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dania Schumann. The network helps show where Dania Schumann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dania Schumann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dania Schumann Line = papers co-authored together Dania Schumann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017126
2 2017124
3 201671
4 201768
5 201961
6 202054
7 202133
8 201629
9 201323
10 201821
11 202114
12 201713
13 201911
14 202010
15 20187
16 20216

About Dania Schumann

Dania Schumann is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gastroenterology, Ecology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Physiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (4 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (193 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (73 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (19 citations), Physiology (143 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Dania Schumann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Holger Cramer, Romy Lauche, Jost Langhorst, Gustav Dobos, Christian S. Keßler, Petra Klose, Gustav Dobos, Jon Adams, Tobias Sundberg and Matthew Leach. Their work appears in journals such as Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nutrition, Frontiers in Psychology and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact