Dane Thomas

611 citations
21 papers · 484 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Dane Thomas

20 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Dane Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 199
  • Forestry 47
  • Horticulture 10
  • Plant Science 228
  • Global and Planetary Change 128
Replace K. Pinyopusarerk with:
K. Pinyopusarerk Australia
David Gwaze United States
Michael Henson Australia
Gabriel Dehon Sampaio Peçanha Rezende Brazil
Antônio Marcos Rosado Brazil
C. C. Lambeth United States
ER Williams
Edward Missanjo Malawi
Brian S. Baltunis Australia
Risto Vuokko Indonesia
Dane Thomas relative to K. Pinyopusarerk Australia K. Pinyopusarerk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
K. Pinyopusarerk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dane Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dane Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dane Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dane Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dane Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dane Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dane Thomas. The network helps show where Dane Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dane Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dane Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Dane Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007117
2 200764
3 200843
4 200240
5 201140
6 200826
7 200924
8 201016
9 201316
10 200415
11 201015
12 201214
13 202213
14 201312
15
Genetic variation in shrinkaGe properties of Eucalyptus pilularis assessed usinG increment cores and test blocks
200811
16 201911
17 20113
18 20082
19 20251
20
Conservation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in 44 wood quality candidate genes of Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus pyrocarpa and Eucalyptus pilularis
20101

About Dane Thomas

Dane Thomas is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Plant Science and Cell Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (3 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (3 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (199 citations), Forestry (47 citations), Horticulture (10 citations), Plant Science (228 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (128 citations). Dane Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. W. Turner, Jürgen Bauhus, R. Geoff B. Smith, Adrienne B. Nicotra, Derek Eamus, Michael Henson, Robert J Henry, Mervyn Shepherd, Patrick Pyttel and David I. Forrester. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Forestry, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Australian Journal of Botany and Energy Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact