C. C. Lambeth

17 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

C. C. Lambeth
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 309
  • Forestry 31
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 61
  • Environmental Chemistry 51
  • Global and Planetary Change 96
Replace P. P. Cotterill with:
P. P. Cotterill Australia
G. S. Foster United States
David Gwaze United States
E. K. Morgenstern Canada
C. A. Dean United States
Brian S. Baltunis Australia
F. E. Bridgwater United States
Gregory W. Dutkowski Australia
Gabriel Dehon Sampaio Peçanha Rezende Brazil
C. G. Tauer United States
C. C. Lambeth relative to P. P. Cotterill Australia P. P. Cotterill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P. P. Cotterill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. C. Lambeth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. C. Lambeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. C. Lambeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. C. Lambeth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. C. Lambeth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. C. Lambeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. C. Lambeth. The network helps show where C. C. Lambeth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside C. C. Lambeth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. C. Lambeth Line = papers co-authored together C. C. Lambeth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1980157
2 200163
3
Genetic analysis of 16 clonal trials of Eucalyptus grandis and comparisons with seedling checks.
199431
4 198731
5 199324
6 198421
7 199220
8 200517
9 200014
10 199313
11
Performance of single family versus mixed family plantation blocks of loblolly pine
198313
12 199712
13 198311
14 199010
15 19935
16
White pine plantings in the Highlands of Colombia.
19902
17
Growth and quality of 460 clones of Eucalyptus grandis and gains over commercial seed lots.
19901

About C. C. Lambeth

C. C. Lambeth is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Mechanics of Materials, Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (7 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Plant and soil sciences (2 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers) and Growth and nutrition in plants (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (309 citations), Forestry (31 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (61 citations), Environmental Chemistry (51 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (96 citations). C. C. Lambeth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David M. O’Malley, Nicholas C. Wheeler, G. S. Foster, Mitsuhiro ENDO, Michael S. Greenwood, Bai-Lian Li, Claire G. Williams, Michael B. Kane, W. S. Dvorak and Constance A. Harrington. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Forest Science and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact