Dana Phillips

725 citations
19 papers · 301 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dana Phillips

18 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Dana Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Literature and Literary Theory 182
  • Geography, Planning and Development 60
  • Cultural Studies 48
  • Philosophy 41
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
Replace Serpil Oppermann with:
Serpil Oppermann Türkiye
Greg Garrard United Kingdom
Adeline Johns‐Putra United Kingdom
Simon C. Estók South Korea
Louise Westling United States
Terry Gifford United Kingdom
Serenella Iovino Italy
Joni Adamson United States
Edward Abbey
Anne D. Wallace United States
Dana Phillips relative to Serpil Oppermann Türkiye Serpil Oppermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Serpil Oppermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Phillips. The network helps show where Dana Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Dana Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Dana Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200386
2 201459
3 199934
4 199633
5 201517
6 200115
7 200814
8 200310
9 19949
10
Ecocriticism, ecopoetics, and a creed outworn
20086
11 20103
12 20003
13 20153
14 20172
15 20062
16 19942
17 20102
18 20061
19 19940

About Dana Phillips

Dana Phillips is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Cultural Studies and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (9 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (6 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (182 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (60 citations), Cultural Studies (48 citations), Philosophy (41 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations). Dana Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Hannes Bergthaller, Robert Emmett, Shane McCorristine, Susanna Lidström, Adeline Johns‐Putra, Kate Rigby and Libby Robin. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Environmental Values, Safundi, Nineteenth-Century Literature and ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact