Dana Heller

540 citations
23 papers · 169 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Gender, Feminism, and Media
    • Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Music top 10%
    • Music History and Culture

Papers in

Dana Heller

22 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Dana Heller
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Gender Studies 53
  • Music 12
  • Communication 24
  • Cultural Studies 26
  • Literature and Literary Theory 29
Replace Julie Rak with:
Julie Rak Canada
Regina Barreca United States
Morag Shiach United Kingdom
Kathleen McHugh United States
Charles Ramírez Berg United States
Marquis Bey United States
Rebecca Munford United Kingdom
Anna Gibbs Australia
Ann duCille
Michael Renov United States
Dana Heller relative to Julie Rak Canada Julie Rak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Julie Rak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Heller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Heller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Heller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Heller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Heller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Heller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Heller. The network helps show where Dana Heller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Dana Heller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Heller Line = papers co-authored together Dana Heller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200733
2
Cross-purposes : lesbians, feminists, and the limits of alliance
199733
3 200719
4 200315
5 20038
6 19897
7 20017
8
Fraud on the Market Meets Behavioral Finance
20056
9 20196
10 20026
11 20036
12
The Holy Fool in Russian and American Culture: A Dialogue
20035
13 19953
14 20113
15 20082
16 20112
17 20052
18 19912
19
Sex and the Series: Paris, New York, and Post-National Romance
20051
20 19971

About Dana Heller

Dana Heller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Gender Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 169 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (53 citations), Music (12 citations), Communication (24 citations), Cultural Studies (26 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (29 citations). Dana Heller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Janet Bing and Frederick C. Dunbar. Their work appears in journals such as Popular Music, Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature, CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture, GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies and College Composition and Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact