Dana Frederick

1.1k citations
22 papers · 935 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Dana Frederick

22 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Dana Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Microbiology 131
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 233
  • Cancer Research 132
  • Molecular Biology 479
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 106
Replace Glenn Dorsam with:
Glenn Dorsam United States
Duraiswamy Navaneetham United States
Hiroshi Yazawa Japan
T Tominaga Japan
Catherine de Coupade France
Paul Mondière France
Swamy K. Polumuri United States
Rashna D. Balsara United States
Jelka Gabrilovac Croatia
Anne L. Crews United States
Dana Frederick relative to Glenn Dorsam United States Glenn Dorsam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Glenn Dorsam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Frederick. The network helps show where Dana Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Dana Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989205
2 2010130
3 200586
4 200881
5 199575
6 199564
7 199650
8 199650
9 199443
10 200931
11 199626
12 199426
13 199416
14 199515
15 197514
16 201312
17 19914
18 19962
19 20242
20 20241

About Dana Frederick

Dana Frederick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (131 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (233 citations), Cancer Research (132 citations), Molecular Biology (479 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (106 citations). Dana Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hank F. Kung, André J. Ouellette, Mei‐Ping Kung, John T. Fallon, Marianne F. James, Rita Greco, Mu Mu, Zhi‐Ping Zhuang, Janet L. Stein and André J. van Wijnen. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Human Molecular Genetics, Bioconjugate Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Experimental Hematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact