Dana E. Powell

678 citations
19 papers · 351 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Dana E. Powell

17 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Dana E. Powell
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Geography, Planning and Development 38
  • Health 36
  • General Social Sciences 16
  • Anthropology 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 169
Replace Michal Osterweil with:
Michal Osterweil United States
Robert Andolina United States
Emily Billo United States
Verónica Gago Argentina
Murray Low United Kingdom
Rachael Diprose Australia
Maria Bargh New Zealand
Steffen Dalsgaard Denmark
Carl M. Hand United States
Dirk Kohnert South Africa
Dana E. Powell relative to Michal Osterweil United States Michal Osterweil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Michal Osterweil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana E. Powell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana E. Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana E. Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana E. Powell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana E. Powell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana E. Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana E. Powell. The network helps show where Dana E. Powell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dana E. Powell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana E. Powell Line = papers co-authored together Dana E. Powell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2008173
2 201848
3 201047
4 201522
5 201317
6 200616
7 20219
8 20174
9 20203
10 20132
11 20242
12 20192
13 20192
14 20181
15 20181
16 20231
17 20131
18 20180
19 20240

About Dana E. Powell

Dana E. Powell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, General Health Professions, Building and Construction and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Mining and Resource Management (4 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (38 citations), Health (36 citations), General Social Sciences (16 citations), Anthropology (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (169 citations). Dana E. Powell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Michal Osterweil, Maribel Casas‐Cortés, Dorothy Holland, Georgina Drew, Eugenia Eng, María Isabel Casas, Laura England and Rebecca Witter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Ecology, Anthropological Quarterly, Development, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales eBooks and Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact