Dana Block‐Abraham

460 citations
19 papers · 312 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dana Block‐Abraham

19 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Dana Block‐Abraham
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 161
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 138
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 47
  • Urology 6
  • Reproductive Medicine 8
Replace GA Macones with:
GA Macones United States
Valeria Bezzeccheri Italy
O. Cavicchioni Italy
Charles M. McCurdy United States
Meiling Hua United States
Etaoin Kent Ireland
Carla Pittini Italy
Hans Duvekot Netherlands
Arthur Zaltz Canada
Stefania Livio Italy
Dana Block‐Abraham relative to GA Macones United States GA Macones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
GA Macones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Block‐Abraham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Block‐Abraham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Block‐Abraham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Block‐Abraham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Block‐Abraham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Block‐Abraham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Block‐Abraham. The network helps show where Dana Block‐Abraham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Block‐Abraham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Block‐Abraham Line = papers co-authored together Dana Block‐Abraham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201451
2 201349
3 201641
4 201538
5 201423
6 201622
7 201517
8 201416
9 201713
10 201411
11 20188
12 20136
13 20184
14 20173
15 20123
16 20133
17 20142
18 20131
19 20141

About Dana Block‐Abraham

Dana Block‐Abraham is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (161 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (138 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (47 citations), Urology (6 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (8 citations). Dana Block‐Abraham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ahmet Baschat, Viola Seravalli, Jena L. Miller, Rebekah E. Gee, Miriam G. Blitzer, Özhan Turan, Danielle Tate, Kavita Shah Arora, U. Gembruch and Sarah Crimmins. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hypertension in Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis and Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact