Dan Titcomb
Impact in
-
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
-
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Esophageal and GI Pathology
- Surgical Simulation and Training
Papers in
- Surgery 10
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 7
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 6
-
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 3
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Infection Control and Ventilation 1
- Co-authors
- Jane Blazeby (8 shared papers)C P Barham (5 shared papers)Richard Krysztopik (4 shared papers)Christopher G. Streets (4 shared papers)Natalie Blencowe (2 shared papers)Chris Metcalfe (4 shared papers)Andrew Hollowood (2 shared papers)Jenny Donovan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trials (2 papers)International Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)Surgical Endoscopy (1 paper)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dan Titcomb
11 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 182
- Surgery 207
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 30
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 7
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 18
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Titcomb
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Titcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Titcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Titcomb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Titcomb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Titcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Titcomb. The network helps show where Dan Titcomb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Titcomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 |
About Dan Titcomb
Dan Titcomb is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Infectious Diseases and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (182 citations), Surgery (207 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (30 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (7 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (18 citations). Dan Titcomb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Blazeby, C P Barham, Richard Krysztopik, Christopher G. Streets, Natalie Blencowe, Chris Metcalfe, Andrew Hollowood, Jenny Donovan, Stephen Falk and Andrew D. Hollowood. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, International Journal of Surgery, Health Technology Assessment, Surgical Endoscopy and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.