Karen E. Bowker

89 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Karen E. Bowker
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Medicine 671
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 155
  • Pharmacology 748
  • Clinical Biochemistry 225
  • Infectious Diseases 366
Replace Ellie Hershberger with:
Ellie Hershberger United States
H. A. Holt United Kingdom
H. C. Neu United States
Ross Davidson Canada
Shi Wu China
Paul Lephart United States
Luisa Sorlí Spain
Jennifer M Streit United States
Jared L. Crandon United States
Deborah C. Draghi United States
Karen E. Bowker relative to Ellie Hershberger United States Ellie Hershberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ellie Hershberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen E. Bowker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E. Bowker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E. Bowker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E. Bowker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E. Bowker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E. Bowker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E. Bowker. The network helps show where Karen E. Bowker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen E. Bowker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen E. Bowker Line = papers co-authored together Karen E. Bowker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994117
2 199898
3 199677
4 200366
5 201550
6 200248
7
The passage of bacteria through surgical drapes.
200047
8 201346
9 199742
10 199941
11 201939
12 201237
13 201337
14 199936
15 200234
16 200634
17 199733
18 199932
19 200131
20 200830

About Karen E. Bowker

Karen E. Bowker is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Medicine, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (47 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (42 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (18 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (14 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (14 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (12 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (9 papers) and Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (671 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (155 citations), Pharmacology (748 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (225 citations) and Infectious Diseases (366 citations). Karen E. Bowker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Alasdair MacGowan, Alan Noel, H. A. Holt, Mandy Wootton, Chris Rogers, Mahableshwar Albur, David S. Reeves, G.C. Bannister, Ashley Blom and James McLauchlin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, Journal of Hospital Infection and Journal of Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact