Dan Steeves

539 citations
10 papers · 377 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Steeves

10 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Dan Steeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Applied Psychology 148
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
  • Physiology 251
  • Clinical Psychology 153
  • Literature and Literary Theory 22
Replace A. M. Leventhal with:
A. M. Leventhal United States
J. Davis VanderVeen United States
Constance Wood United States
Jesus Chavarria United States
Jodie Greenberg United States
Peter D. Soyster United States
Ángel García‐Pérez Spain
Constantin Yves Plessen Germany
William H. Craft United States
Ilse Verveer Netherlands
Dan Steeves relative to A. M. Leventhal United States A. M. Leventhal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
A. M. Leventhal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Steeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Steeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Steeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Steeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Steeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Steeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Steeves. The network helps show where Dan Steeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dan Steeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Steeves Line = papers co-authored together Dan Steeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2009128
2 201160
3 201357
4 201254
5 200852
6 200912
7 20059
8 20063
9 20231
10 20211

About Dan Steeves

Dan Steeves is a scholar working on Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (148 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (218 citations), Physiology (251 citations), Clinical Psychology (153 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (22 citations). Dan Steeves has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sherry H. Stewart, Michael J. Zvolensky, Dubravka Gavric, Anka A. Vujanovic, David Rosenfield, Kirsten A. Johnson, Amit Bernstein, Adam M. Leventhal, Kirsten J. Langdon and Christine Darredeau. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Drug and Alcohol Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact