Dan Reed

694 citations
9 papers · 348 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Reed

8 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Dan Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Hardware and Architecture 182
  • Information Systems and Management 99
  • Computer Networks and Communications 317
  • Information Systems 129
  • Artificial Intelligence 25
Replace Florian Schintke with:
Florian Schintke Germany
Jonathan Geisler United States
J.E. Hayes Canada
James Magowan United Kingdom
Kasidit Chanchio United States
Darcy Quesnel United States
Rob Armstrong United States
Bill Allcock United States
Rajkumar Kettimuthu United States
Dave Pearson United States
Dan Reed relative to Florian Schintke Germany Florian Schintke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Florian Schintke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Reed. The network helps show where Dan Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Reed Line = papers co-authored together Dan Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2001218
2 200260
3 200351
4 20117
5 20035
6 19923
7 19953
8 20051
9 20050

About Dan Reed

Dan Reed is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (6 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (4 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (2 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (1 paper) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (182 citations), Information Systems and Management (99 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (317 citations), Information Systems (129 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (25 citations). Dan Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ken Kennedy, Ian Foster, Linda Torczon, Keith D. Cooper, Andrew A. Chien, Carl Kesselman, Francine Berman, Jack Dongarra, Dennis Gannon and Rich Wolski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Internet Services and Applications, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications and Conference on High Performance Computing (Supercomputing).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact