Dan Priel
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Legal principles and applications
- Law in Society and Culture
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Philosophy top 10%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
Papers in
- Law 40
- Legal principles and applications 23
- Law in Society and Culture 18
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 13
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 8
-
- Free Will and Agency 15
- Co-authors
- David Luban (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law and Philosophy (5 papers)Modern Law Review (3 papers)Law & Society Review (1 paper)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1 paper)Legal Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dan Priel
38 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Law 95
- Philosophy 39
- Political Science and International Relations 51
- Pharmacy 10
- Cognitive Neuroscience 35
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Priel
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Priel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Priel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Priel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Priel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Priel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Priel. The network helps show where Dan Priel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Dan Priel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 16 | Law Is What the Judge Had for Breakfast: A Brief History of an Unpalatable Idea | 2020 | 3 |
| 17 | Torts, Rights, and Right-Wing Ideology | 2011 | 3 |
| 18 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 20 | Evidence-Based Jurisprudence: An Essay for Oxford | 2019 | 2 |
About Dan Priel
Dan Priel is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 140 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (23 papers), Law in Society and Culture (18 papers), Free Will and Agency (15 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (13 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (95 citations), Philosophy (39 citations), Political Science and International Relations (51 citations), Pharmacy (10 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (35 citations). Dan Priel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Luban. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Philosophy, Modern Law Review, Law & Society Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies and Legal Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.