Dan Parker
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 12
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 8
- Second Language Acquisition and Learning 2
- Co-authors
- Colin Phillips (4 shared papers)Sol Lago (2 shared papers)Ellen Lau (2 shared papers)Wing-Yee Chow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychology (3 papers)Journal of Memory and Language (3 papers)Glossa a journal of general linguistics (2 papers)Cognition (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dan Parker
13 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Language and Linguistics 212
- Cognitive Neuroscience 233
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 148
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
- Linguistics and Language 19
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Parker. The network helps show where Dan Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Dan Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 |
About Dan Parker
Dan Parker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (12 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Topic Modeling (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (212 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (233 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (148 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations) and Linguistics and Language (19 citations). Dan Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Colin Phillips, Sol Lago, Ellen Lau and Wing-Yee Chow. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Memory and Language, Glossa a journal of general linguistics, Cognition and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.