Dan Knight

1.1k citations
36 papers · 761 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Knight

36 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Dan Knight
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 330
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 133
  • Emergency Medicine 64
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
  • Physiology 112
Replace I M Dauber with:
I M Dauber United States
Leonard Brooks United States
Robert Bernstein United States
F. Vetterlein Germany
Anneke Koeman Netherlands
Albert N. Swafford United States
Kevin J. Alker United States
Abdul Maher United Kingdom
Herbert A. Berkoff United States
Dan Knight relative to I M Dauber United States I M Dauber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
I M Dauber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Knight. The network helps show where Dan Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Knight Line = papers co-authored together Dan Knight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989111
2 199589
3 201757
4 198950
5 198543
6 198641
7 199038
8 199433
9 198530
10 198829
11 202026
12 199423
13 199022
14 202120
15 198820
16 198815
17 199114
18 198813
19 199112
20 20239

About Dan Knight

Dan Knight is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (330 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (133 citations), Emergency Medicine (64 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations) and Physiology (112 citations). Dan Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen F. Vatner, W T Manders, Dorothy E. Vatner, Andrew H. Smith, John T. Fallon, C J Homcy, Y. T. Shen, Mark A. Young, J. X. Thomas and Don R. Canfield. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Circulation Research, Hypertension, Journal of Applied Physiology and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact