Dan Knight

38 papers receiving 834 citations

Peers

Dan Knight
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 365
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 150
  • Emergency Medicine 70
  • Physiology 131
  • Nephrology 36
Replace J. Craig Hartman with:
J. Craig Hartman United States
Robert D. Bernstein United States
L. H. Michael United States
Masafumi Kitakaze Japan
Anneke Koeman Netherlands
I M Dauber United States
Stephen W. Ely United States
Yutaka Fujii Japan
Hiroharu Funaya Japan
Dan Knight relative to J. Craig Hartman United States J. Craig Hartman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.2×
J. Craig Hartman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Knight. The network helps show where Dan Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Knight Line = papers co-authored together Dan Knight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989116
2 199590
3 201764
4 198956
5 198547
6 198646
7 199045
8 202036
9 199433
10 198831
11 198529
12 199427
13 198824
14 199023
15 202120
16 198818
17 202417
18 199117
19 202415
20 202314

About Dan Knight

Dan Knight is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Animal Science and Zoology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (365 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (150 citations), Emergency Medicine (70 citations), Physiology (131 citations) and Nephrology (36 citations). Dan Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen F. Vatner, W. Thomas Manders, Dorothy E. Vatner, Y. T. Shen, Andrew H. Smith, C J Homcy, John T. Fallon, Mark A. Young, J. X. Thomas and Don R. Canfield. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Circulation Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, Circulation and European Journal of Heart Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact