Dan Isaak

641 citations
9 papers · 454 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Isaak

9 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Dan Isaak
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 275
  • Ecological Modeling 76
  • Water Science and Technology 183
  • Ecology 298
  • Environmental Engineering 81
Replace Sharon Parkes with:
Sharon Parkes United States
David Hockman‐Wert United States
N. J. Mantua United States
Alisha Steward Australia
Alison Whipple United States
Christina Papadaki Greece
Nick Marsh Australia
M. J. Dunbar United Kingdom
George T. Merovich United States
Andrew Pike United States
Dan Isaak relative to Sharon Parkes United States Sharon Parkes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sharon Parkes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Isaak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Isaak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Isaak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Isaak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Isaak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Isaak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Isaak. The network helps show where Dan Isaak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Isaak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Isaak Line = papers co-authored together Dan Isaak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013171
2 2014115
3 200775
4 202033
5 200928
6 201718
7 20228
8 20215
9
Warming and warnings: Assessing climate change vulnerability in the Rocky Mountain Region
20181

About Dan Isaak

Dan Isaak is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Environmental Engineering and Water Science and Technology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (2 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (2 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper) and Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (275 citations), Ecological Modeling (76 citations), Water Science and Technology (183 citations), Ecology (298 citations) and Environmental Engineering (81 citations). Dan Isaak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jim McKean, Seth J. Wenger, C. Wayne Wright, Brian Staab, Marc G. Kramer, Charles H. Luce, Nicholas A. Som, Chris E. Jordan, David M. Theobald and Kristina M. McNyset. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Eos, Conservation Physiology, Water Resources Research and Global Change Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact