Dan Eisikowitch

2.9k citations
87 papers · 2.4k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Eisikowitch

85 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Dan Eisikowitch
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
  • Insect Science 681
  • Plant Science 1.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 421
  • Genetics 408
Replace Massimo Nepi with:
Massimo Nepi Italy
Shuang‐Quan Huang China
Marcia González‐Teuber Chile
Christopher J. Frost United States
Catherine A. Preston Germany
Velemir Ninkovic Sweden
Robert G. Stanley United States
David E. Dussourd United States
Shuqing Xu Germany
Grit Kunert Germany
Dan Eisikowitch relative to Massimo Nepi Italy Massimo Nepi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Massimo Nepi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Eisikowitch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Eisikowitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Eisikowitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Eisikowitch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Eisikowitch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Eisikowitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Eisikowitch. The network helps show where Dan Eisikowitch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Eisikowitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Eisikowitch Line = papers co-authored together Dan Eisikowitch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968225
2 1968137
3 200399
4 200084
5 200183
6 198276
7 197163
8 197163
9 196962
10 199857
11 198154
12 201153
13 198853
14 199352
15 199050
16 198948
17 199047
18 198944
19 198740
20 198039

About Dan Eisikowitch

Dan Eisikowitch is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Insect Science, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (65 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (25 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (17 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (17 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (14 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (14 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Insect Science (681 citations), Plant Science (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (421 citations) and Genetics (408 citations). Dan Eisikowitch has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. Galil, Peter G. Kevan, Yiftach Vaknin, Avital Bechar, Raphael A. Stern, S. Gan‐Mor, Stanley R. J. Woodell, Amots Dafni, Sharoni Shafir and Arnon Dag. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, New Phytologist, Journal of Apicultural Research, Plant Systematics and Evolution and Apidologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact