Michael I. Haverty

3.5k citations
131 papers · 2.9k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Michael I. Haverty

129 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Michael I. Haverty
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Insect Science 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
  • Genetics 2.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 268
  • Ecology 404
Replace H. G. Fowler with:
H. G. Fowler Brazil
G. Benz Switzerland
Thomas Bourguignon Czechia
Brian T. Forschler United States
Xavier Espadaler Spain
R. A. Crowson United Kingdom
Fusao Nakasuji Japan
Daegan Inward United Kingdom
Thomas Eltz Germany
Alberto T. Barrion Philippines
Michael I. Haverty relative to H. G. Fowler Brazil H. G. Fowler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
H. G. Fowler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael I. Haverty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael I. Haverty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael I. Haverty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael I. Haverty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael I. Haverty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael I. Haverty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael I. Haverty. The network helps show where Michael I. Haverty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael I. Haverty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael I. Haverty Line = papers co-authored together Michael I. Haverty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982108
2 198882
3 198466
4 199665
5 198760
6 198960
7 198159
8 198157
9 197357
10 199155
11 199053
12 197453
13 198752
14 199651
15 199949
16 200648
17 200048
18 197547
19 199747
20 200044

About Michael I. Haverty

Michael I. Haverty is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 131 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (100 papers), Plant and animal studies (78 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (44 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (28 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (9 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Genetics (2.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (268 citations) and Ecology (404 citations). Michael I. Haverty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Lori J. Nelson, Barbara L. Thorne, William L. Nutting, Vernard R. Lewis, Ralph W. Howard, Marion Page, Minoru Tamashiro, Nan‐Yao Su, Brian T. Forschler and Julian R. Yates. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Insectes Sociaux.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact