Dan Brough
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Papers in
-
- Soil Geostatistics and Mapping 8
-
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 4
- Soil erosion and sediment transport 2
- Soil Management and Crop Yield 1
- Co-authors
- Alex B. McBratney (4 shared papers)Budiman Minasny (4 shared papers)Grant Tranter (3 shared papers)Brian Murphy (2 shared papers)David Jacquier (1 shared paper)Neil J. McKenzie (2 shared papers)Mike Grundy (2 shared papers)Mark Thomas (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Dan Brough
10 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Soil Science 239
- Environmental Engineering 266
- Civil and Structural Engineering 111
- Environmental Chemistry 45
- Analytical Chemistry 38
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Brough
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Brough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Brough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Brough more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Brough
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Brough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Brough. The network helps show where Dan Brough may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Brough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 9 | IMPROVED INPUTS FOR PREDICTION OF REGIONAL-SCALE SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL FOR QUEENSLAND | 2004 | 2 |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 11 | Proposed project methods for the Flinders and Gilbert agricultural resource assessment | 2012 | 1 |
About Dan Brough
Dan Brough is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Soil Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (8 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Soil and Land Suitability Analysis (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers) and Soil Management and Crop Yield (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (239 citations), Environmental Engineering (266 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (111 citations), Environmental Chemistry (45 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (38 citations). Dan Brough has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Alex B. McBratney, Budiman Minasny, Grant Tranter, Brian Murphy, David Jacquier, Neil J. McKenzie, Mike Grundy, Mark Thomas, Linda Gregory and David J Clifford. Their work appears in journals such as Geoderma, Soil Research, European Journal of Soil Science, Geoderma Regional and Global Food Security.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.