Dan A. Fuller

14 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Dan A. Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35
  • Public Administration 11
  • Economics and Econometrics 81
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 47
  • Strategy and Management 40
Replace Julian Lamont with:
Julian Lamont Australia
Mark Plant United States
Donna Burton United States
Matthew Fuhrmann United States
Joseph R. Biden United States
Daniel Kuehn United States
Sergey Kulik Russia
Hans‐Liudger Dienel Germany
Kevin Siqueira United States
Eric V. Larson United States
Dan A. Fuller relative to Julian Lamont Australia Julian Lamont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Julian Lamont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan A. Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan A. Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan A. Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan A. Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan A. Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan A. Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan A. Fuller. The network helps show where Dan A. Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dan A. Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan A. Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Dan A. Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2003100
2 201386
3 197738
4 201428
5
The Split between Political Parties on Economic Issues: A Survey of Republicans, Democrats, and Economists
199521
6 200714
7 198712
8 201410
9 19915
10 19964
11 20004
12 19962
13
Polarization on Economic Issues over Time-A Survey of Delegates to the National Conventions
20141
14
The management of upstream and downstream risk through selective contracting.
19921
15 20230

About Dan A. Fuller

Dan A. Fuller is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (35 citations), Public Administration (11 citations), Economics and Econometrics (81 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (47 citations) and Strategy and Management (40 citations). Dan A. Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jaret Matthews, Mark Maimone, Jeffrey Biesiadecki, John Leichty, M. Heverly, Justin Lin, Michael Vaughan, Richard M. Alston, Debra L. Scammon and Lise Gauvin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Economic Education, Deviant Behavior, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Journal of Field Robotics and Energy Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact