Daming Deng

20 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Daming Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 125
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 137
  • Epidemiology 121
  • Neurology 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Replace Konstandina Koklanis with:
Konstandina Koklanis Australia
N P Strong United Kingdom
Yasmin S. Bradfield United States
Trevano W. Dean United States
Xuehan Qian China
Angeline Nguyen United States
Christiane Norenberg Germany
Alison Bruce United Kingdom
J. Deneen United States
Karen Searcey United States
Daming Deng relative to Konstandina Koklanis Australia Konstandina Koklanis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Konstandina Koklanis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daming Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daming Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daming Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daming Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daming Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daming Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daming Deng. The network helps show where Daming Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daming Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daming Deng Line = papers co-authored together Daming Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201281
2 201551
3 201549
4 201637
5 201514
6 201613
7 20127
8 20124
9 20194
10
[The effect of weakening the overaction superior oblique muscles on the status of ocular torsion].
20064
11
Study on ocular torsion of V patterns strabismus.
20034
12 20163
13 20203
14 20192
15 20212
16 20212
17 20081
18 20231
19 20241
20
Corneal topographical changes following strabismus surgery.
19991

About Daming Deng

Daming Deng is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (21 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (4 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (125 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (137 citations), Epidemiology (121 citations), Neurology (46 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Daming Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tao Shen, Jingchang Chen, Jianhua Yan, Qiwen Chen, Minbin Yu, Zidong Chen, Jinrong Li, Daniel P. Spiegel, Lily Y. L. Chan and Robert F. Hess. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Annals of Translational Medicine and Ophthalmology and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact