Daming Deng

764 citations
24 papers · 594 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daming Deng

23 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Daming Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 293
  • Ophthalmology 114
  • Neurology 83
  • Epidemiology 298
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 38
Replace Jinrong Li with:
Jinrong Li China
Andrew T. Astle United Kingdom
Xiaofeng Tao United States
Michael Fendick United States
Christine Timms United Kingdom
Elizabeth L. Lazar United States
T. C. A. Jenkins United Kingdom
Susanna M. Tamkins United States
Vijay Tailor United Kingdom
Lixia Feng China
Daming Deng relative to Jinrong Li China Jinrong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jinrong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daming Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daming Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daming Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daming Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daming Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daming Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daming Deng. The network helps show where Daming Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daming Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daming Deng Line = papers co-authored together Daming Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011179
2 201384
3 201370
4 201666
5 201628
6 201424
7 200724
8 201222
9 201221
10 201219
11 201318
12 20177
13
[Quality of life assessment in children with congenital bilateral cataract].
20077
14 20206
15 20205
16 20193
17
[Development and evaluation of the scale of quality of life for children with bilateral congenital cataract].
20073
18 20232
19 20232
20 20241

About Daming Deng

Daming Deng is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology and Neurology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (293 citations), Ophthalmology (114 citations), Neurology (83 citations), Epidemiology (298 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (38 citations). Daming Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Minbin Yu, Benjamin Thompson, Lily Y. L. Chan, Robert F. Hess, Jinrong Li, Jingrong Li, Carly Siu Yin Lam, George C. Woo, Goro Maehara and Daniel P. Spiegel. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Scientific Reports, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, BMC Ophthalmology and Neurotherapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact