Dagmar Steiner

35 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers

Dagmar Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
  • Internal Medicine 36
  • Developmental Neuroscience 33
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 138
  • Emergency Medicine 52
Replace Jane C.K. Fitch with:
Jane C.K. Fitch United States
Prakash P Punjabi United Kingdom
Timothy F. Christian United States
Leonarda Galiuto Italy
Gudmund Semb Norway
M Kusagawa Japan
Mark E. Comunale United States
John H. Sanders United States
Michael P. Vallely Australia
Mats Heideman Sweden
Dagmar Steiner relative to Jane C.K. Fitch United States Jane C.K. Fitch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jane C.K. Fitch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dagmar Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmar Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmar Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmar Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmar Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmar Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmar Steiner. The network helps show where Dagmar Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dagmar Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dagmar Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Dagmar Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992220
2 1992139
3 200280
4 197874
5 199639
6 200322
7 201322
8 201520
9 200019
10 199915
11 201715
12 199911
13 20018
14 20088
15 20238
16 20217
17
[Antigranulocyte scintigraphy of septic loosening of hip endoprosthesis: effect of different methods of analysis].
20017
18 20015
19 19905
20 19675

About Dagmar Steiner

Dagmar Steiner is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (3 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations), Internal Medicine (36 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (33 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (138 citations) and Emergency Medicine (52 citations). Dagmar Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. D. Menger, K. Meßmer, R. Klett, Richard Bauer, Reinhold P. Linke, Klaus Altland, N. Bleese, P. Kalmár, G. Rodewald and Volker Döring. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery and The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact