D. King

2.8k citations
42 papers · 513 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

D. King

37 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

D. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 363
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 158
  • Aerospace Engineering 211
  • Materials Chemistry 197
  • Radiation 23
Replace K. Kirov with:
K. Kirov United Kingdom
Ye. O. Kazakov Germany
J. McClenaghan United States
C. Collins United States
A. Bader United States
S. Sudo Japan
A. Sirinelli France
K. Rahbarnia Germany
R. Akers United Kingdom
D. King relative to K. Kirov United Kingdom K. Kirov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
K. Kirov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. King. The network helps show where D. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. King Line = papers co-authored together D. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200380
2 201147
3 201541
4 201131
5 201922
6 201622
7 201622
8 201520
9 201719
10 201718
11 201517
12 201817
13 200716
14 201212
15 201511
16 202310
17 202210
18 202010
19 20189
20 20238

About D. King

D. King is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (35 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (26 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (363 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (158 citations), Aerospace Engineering (211 citations), Materials Chemistry (197 citations) and Radiation (23 citations). D. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Surrey, V. M. Nakariakov, Andrew Holmes, K. G. McClements, L. Golub, E. E. DeLuca, L. Garzotti, R. McAdams, D. Keeling and C. Challis. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science and Solar Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact