D James
Impact in
Papers in
- Surgery 9
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 4
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 3
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment 2
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- John P. Neoptolemos (5 shared papers)N.J.M. London (3 shared papers)Irene Bailey (2 shared papers)D P Fossard (2 shared papers)D L Carr-Locke (1 shared paper)Janet Lavelle (2 shared papers)David E. Brown (1 shared paper)Sasmit Roy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British journal of surgery (3 papers)The Lancet (2 papers)British Journal of Radiology (1 paper)Biomedical Chromatography (1 paper)Clinical Radiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
D James
13 papers receiving 808 citations
D James's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Surgery 851
- Oncology 447
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 429
- Emergency Medicine 84
- Dermatology 17
Countries citing papers authored by D James
This map shows the geographic impact of D James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D James more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D James
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D James. The network helps show where D James may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside D James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONTROLLED TRIAL OF URGENT ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AND ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY VERSUS CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT FOR ACUTE PANCREATITIS DUE TO GALLSTONES Hit paper breakdown → | 1988 | 574 |
| 2 | 1989 | 85 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 66 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 45 | |
| 6 | Long term follow-up of patients with side to side choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty. | 1987 | 23 |
| 7 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1979 | 1 |
About D James
D James is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Infectious Diseases and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (1 paper) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (851 citations), Oncology (447 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (429 citations), Emergency Medicine (84 citations) and Dermatology (17 citations). D James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John P. Neoptolemos, N.J.M. London, Irene Bailey, D P Fossard, D L Carr-Locke, Janet Lavelle, David E. Brown, Sasmit Roy, T Leese and Ian Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, The Lancet, British Journal of Radiology, Biomedical Chromatography and Clinical Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.