D. J. Gates

90 papers receiving 993 citations

Peers

D. J. Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Electrochemistry 239
  • Condensed Matter Physics 188
  • Mathematical Physics 94
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 127
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 105
Replace Mark Westcott with:
Mark Westcott Australia
Simon Broadbent United Kingdom
Feliksas Ivanauskas Lithuania
Pascal Viot France
Deborah Lacitignola Italy
J. Camacho Spain
Anping Liu China
Takashi Amemiya Japan
Alla Margolina United States
Peter Garik United States
D. J. Gates relative to Mark Westcott Australia Mark Westcott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Mark Westcott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. J. Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. J. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. J. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. J. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. J. Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. J. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. J. Gates. The network helps show where D. J. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. J. Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. J. Gates Line = papers co-authored together D. J. Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983335
2 196957
3 197848
4 201039
5 198239
6 197033
7 198728
8 197826
9 198825
10 198625
11 198623
12 198818
13 198817
14 197915
15 197015
16 198715
17 199514
18 197214
19 198412
20 197212

About D. J. Gates

D. J. Gates is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (19 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (10 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (9 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (7 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (6 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (6 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (6 papers) and Economic theories and models (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (239 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (188 citations), Mathematical Physics (94 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (127 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (105 citations). D. J. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Westcott, Cameron Halliday, T. Lwin, Gill Nelson, Stephen Fletcher, O. Penrose, Peter J. Diggle, John A. Rickard, Mark Westcott and Jeremy J. Burdon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Statistical Physics, Advances in Applied Probability, Journal of Applied Probability, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact