D. Cook
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 137
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 33
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 25
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 11
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 4
- Astro and Planetary Science 3
- Co-authors
- Daniel A. Dale (13 shared papers)Janice Lee (11 shared papers)Daniela Calzetti (11 shared papers)Robert Kennicutt (7 shared papers)Liese van Zee (5 shared papers)Charles W. Engelbracht (3 shared papers)Benjamin D. Johnson (3 shared papers)Matthew D. Shetrone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (33 papers)Physical Review Letters (17 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (16 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (15 papers)Physical review. D (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
D. Cook
204 papers receiving 36.5k citations
D. Cook's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 31.6k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.4k
- Instrumentation 216
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 833
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.9k
Countries citing papers authored by D. Cook
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Cook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Cook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Cook. The network helps show where D. Cook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 207 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 10805 |
| 2 | Advanced LIGO Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 2886 |
| 3 | GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 2792 |
| 4 | Tests of General Relativity with GW150914 Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 1461 |
| 5 | Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 1126 |
| 6 | Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 997 |
| 7 | LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 993 |
| 8 | Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 934 |
| 9 | Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 922 |
| 10 | Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 815 |
| 11 | ASTROPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER GW150914 Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 654 |
| 12 | GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 592 |
| 13 | GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 400 |
| 14 | 2016 | 357 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 307 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 288 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 287 | |
| 18 | Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo | 2016 | 284 |
| 19 | 2003 | 266 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 262 |
About D. Cook
D. Cook is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Religious studies, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 207 papers that have together received 37.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (137 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (33 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (25 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (3 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (31.6k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.4k citations), Instrumentation (216 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (833 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.9k citations). D. Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Dale, Janice Lee, Daniela Calzetti, Robert Kennicutt, Liese van Zee, Charles W. Engelbracht, Benjamin D. Johnson, Matthew D. Shetrone, Michael H. Siegel and Eva K. Grebel. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.