Cosimo Stambe
Impact in
- Nephrology top 2%
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
- Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Clinical Biochemistry top 10%
- Advanced Glycation End Products research
Papers in
-
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes 3
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies 2
-
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 2
- Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling 2
- Retinal Development and Disorders 1
- Co-authors
- David J. Nikolic‐Paterson (7 shared papers)Robert C. Atkins (5 shared papers)Greg H. Tesch (3 shared papers)Prudence A. Hill (4 shared papers)John P. Dowling (3 shared papers)George F. Schreiner (2 shared papers)Robert C. Atkins (2 shared papers)Masaki Takao (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (4 papers)Kidney International (2 papers)Diabetologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cosimo Stambe
7 papers receiving 704 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Nephrology 281
- Clinical Biochemistry 45
- Immunology 94
- Molecular Biology 287
- Immunology and Allergy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Cosimo Stambe
This map shows the geographic impact of Cosimo Stambe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cosimo Stambe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosimo Stambe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cosimo Stambe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cosimo Stambe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cosimo Stambe. The network helps show where Cosimo Stambe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Cosimo Stambe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 172 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 67 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 62 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 60 |
About Cosimo Stambe
Cosimo Stambe is a scholar working on Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 7 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (3 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (2 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (2 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (1 paper), Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper) and Retinal Development and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (281 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (45 citations), Immunology (94 citations), Molecular Biology (287 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (23 citations). Cosimo Stambe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Nikolic‐Paterson, Robert C. Atkins, Greg H. Tesch, Prudence A. Hill, John P. Dowling, George F. Schreiner, Robert C. Atkins, Masaki Takao, L Adhikary and Francis C. C. Chow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Kidney International and Diabetologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.